From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ash v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
Aug 17, 2021
323 So. 3d 850 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2021)

Opinion

No. 1D21-1242

08-17-2021

Isaaih Xavier ASH, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

Isaaih Xavier Ash, pro se, Petitioner. Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.


Isaaih Xavier Ash, pro se, Petitioner.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

Per Curiam.

The Court denies the petition for writ of prohibition on the merits. See Topps v. State , 865 So. 2d 1253, 1258 (Fla. 2004) (explaining that a decision on an extraordinary writ petition that "clearly shows that the issue was considered by the court on the merits" is deemed a decision "which would later bar the litigant from presenting the issue under the doctrines of res judicata or collateral estoppel").

Lewis, Osterhaus, and M.K. Thomas, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Ash v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
Aug 17, 2021
323 So. 3d 850 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2021)
Case details for

Ash v. State

Case Details

Full title:Isaaih Xavier ASH, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Date published: Aug 17, 2021

Citations

323 So. 3d 850 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2021)