Opinion
3:23-cv-01643-MO
07-02-2024
A.S., a pseudonym, Plaintiff, v. STATE OF OREGON, by and through its Department of Human Services; RED ROCK CANYON SCHOOL, L.L.C., a limited liability company; RED ROCK CANYON SCHOOL NON-PROFIT ORGANIZATION, a foreign nonprofit; SEQUEL TSI HOLDINGS, LLC, a foreign limited liability company; HEALTHCARE, LLC, a foreign limited liability company; SEQUEL YOUTHSERVICES OF RED ROCK CANYON, LLC, a foreign limited liability company; MARILYN JONES, in her individual and official capacity; JANA McLELLAN, in her individual and official capacity; GLENDA MARSHALL, in her individual and professional capacity; RYAN SANTI, in his individual and official capacity; GENA PALM, in her individual and professional capacity; and JOHN STUPAK, in his individual and official capacity; and CARE OUTH CORPORATION, a foreign corporation, Defendants.
SEQUEL YOUTH AND FAMILY SERVICES, LLC, a foreign limited liability company; VIVANT BEHAVIORAL JEREMIAH ROSS, Bar No. 105980 ROSS LAW LLC Attorney for Plaintiff JEREMY D. SACKS, Bar No. 994262 STOEL RIVES LLP Attorneys for Defendants Red Rock Canyon School, L.L.C, and Red Rock Canyon School Non-Profit Organization
SEQUEL YOUTH AND FAMILY SERVICES, LLC, a foreign limited liability company; VIVANT BEHAVIORAL JEREMIAH ROSS, Bar No. 105980 ROSS LAW LLC Attorney for Plaintiff
JEREMY D. SACKS, Bar No. 994262 STOEL RIVES LLP Attorneys for Defendants Red Rock Canyon School, L.L.C, and Red Rock Canyon School Non-Profit Organization
STIPULATION (1) WITHDRAWING RED ROCK ENTITIES' RULE 12(B)(5) MOTION TO DISMISS FOR INSUFFICIENT SERVICE OF PROCESS; AND (2) REQUESTING ORDER GRANTING RED ROCK ENTITIES' RULE 12(B)(2) MOTION TO DISMISS FOR LACK OF PERSONAL WRISDICTION
THE HONORABLE MICHAEL W. MOSMAN U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
Counsel for plaintiff and counsel for defendants Red Rock Canyon School, L.L.C, and Red Rock Canyon School Non-Profit Organization (hereinafter jointly referred to as the “Red Rock Entities”) stipulate as follows:
1. The Red Rock Entities withdraw their Rule 12(b)(5) Motion to Dismiss for Insufficient Service of Process. (ECF 52)
2. Plaintiff and the Red Rock Entities stipulate that the law and facts are sufficient for the Court to grant the relief set forth in the Red Rock Entities' Rule 12(b)(2) Motion for Lack of Personal Jurisdiction (ECF 53), and request that the Court enter an order granting that motion and dismissing Plaintiffs' Amended Complaint against the Red Rock Entities for the reasons set for in the Red Rock Entities' Rule 12(b)(2) Motion to Dismiss.
3. All parties shall bear their own attorneys' fees and costs associated with the motions set forth above.
IT IS SO ORDERED.