From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Arzoomanian v. Dietl

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Nov 30, 2021
21 Civ. 6475 (AT) (S.D.N.Y. Nov. 30, 2021)

Opinion

21 Civ. 6475 (AT)

11-30-2021

MARK ARZOOMANIAN, Plaintiff, v. RICHARD “BO” DIETL. Defendant.


ORDER

ANALISA TORRES, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

The Court has been advised that all claims asserted herein have been settled in principle. ECF No. 27. The above-entitled action is hereby dismissed and discontinued without costs, and without prejudice to the right to reopen the action within thirty days of the date of this Order if the settlement is not consummated.

Any application to reopen must be filed within thirty days of this Order; any application to reopen filed thereafter may be denied solely on that basis. Further, if the parties wish for the Com! to retain jurisdiction for the purposes of enforcing any settlement agreement, they must submit the settlement agreement to the Court within the same thirty-day period to be so-ordered by the Corn!. Per Rule IV(C) of the Court's Individual Practices in Civil Cases, the Corn! will not retain jurisdiction to enforce a settlement agreement unless it is made part of the public record.

Any pending motions are moot. All conferences are vacated. The Clerk of Court is directed to close the case.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Arzoomanian v. Dietl

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Nov 30, 2021
21 Civ. 6475 (AT) (S.D.N.Y. Nov. 30, 2021)
Case details for

Arzoomanian v. Dietl

Case Details

Full title:MARK ARZOOMANIAN, Plaintiff, v. RICHARD “BO” DIETL. Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: Nov 30, 2021

Citations

21 Civ. 6475 (AT) (S.D.N.Y. Nov. 30, 2021)