From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Arzola v. Bisbee

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
Feb 16, 2017
3:16-cv-00096-RCJ-VPC (D. Nev. Feb. 16, 2017)

Opinion

3:16-cv-00096-RCJ-VPC

02-16-2017

RICHARD ARZOLA, Plaintiff, v. CONNIE BISBEE et al., Defendants.


ORDER

I. DISCUSSION

On July 18, 2016, this Court dismissed Plaintiff's complaint without leave to amend. (ECF No. 5). On November 22, 2016, Plaintiff filed a motion for relief from judgment under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b). (ECF No. 7). The Court denies the motion.

II. CONCLUSION

For the foregoing reasons, IT IS ORDERED that the motion for relief of judgment (ECF No. 7) is denied.

Dated: This 16th day of February, 2017.

/s/_________

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Arzola v. Bisbee

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
Feb 16, 2017
3:16-cv-00096-RCJ-VPC (D. Nev. Feb. 16, 2017)
Case details for

Arzola v. Bisbee

Case Details

Full title:RICHARD ARZOLA, Plaintiff, v. CONNIE BISBEE et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA

Date published: Feb 16, 2017

Citations

3:16-cv-00096-RCJ-VPC (D. Nev. Feb. 16, 2017)