From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Aryeetey v. United States

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Jul 13, 2020
15-cr-95 (AJN) (S.D.N.Y. Jul. 13, 2020)

Opinion

15-cr-95 (AJN)

07-13-2020

Ivanjoel Aryeetey, Petitioner, v. United States of America, Respondent.


ORDER :

On April 12, 2016, the Government charged Ivanjoel Aryeetey in the S2 superseding indictment filed in the above-captioned case for offenses connected to his alleged involvement with the Big Money Bosses street gang. Dkt. No. 97. On December 8, 2016, he pleaded guilty to Count Four and allocuted to brandishing a firearm in relation to a racketeering conspiracy in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 924(c)(1)(A)(ii). See Dkt. No. 930. On May 15, 2017, the Court imposed a sentence of 84 months' imprisonment on Count Four, to be followed by three years of supervised release. Dkt. No. 1348; see also Dkt. No. 1482.

On November 14, 2019, Mr. Aryeetey filed a motion to vacate his conviction under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 in light of the Supreme Court's decision in United States v. Davis, 139 S. Ct. 2319 (2019). Dkt. No. 2688. Mr. Aryeetey's conviction can no longer stand after Davis, because a racketeering conspiracy qualifies as a "crime of violence" only under the now-stricken residual clause of 18 U.S.C. § 924(c)(3). Davis, 139 S. Ct. at 2336.

As noted at the June 4, 2020 change of plea conference held in this matter, Mr. Aryeetey's petition for a writ of habeas corpus is therefore GRANTED and his conviction on Count Four of the S2 superseding indictment is VACATED. The special assessment imposed under 18 U.S.C. § 3013 is also VACATED. At the change of plea conference, Mr. Aryeetey pleaded guilty to Count One of the S14 superseding information, see Dkt. No. 2906; see also Dkt. No. 2881, and at the sentencing held on June 23, 2020, the Court sentenced him to 60 months' imprisonment, to be followed by three years of supervised release.

Because the Court vacates Mr. Aryeetey's conviction on Count Four of the S2 superseding indictment, it also denies as moot the previously filed § 2255 motion asserting, among others, an ineffective assistance of counsel claim, which he filed pro se and which remains pending. See Dkt. No. 2516. --------

This resolves Dkt. Nos. 2516 and 2688.

SO ORDERED. Dated: July 13, 2020

New York, New York

/s/_________

ALISON J. NATHAN

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Aryeetey v. United States

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Jul 13, 2020
15-cr-95 (AJN) (S.D.N.Y. Jul. 13, 2020)
Case details for

Aryeetey v. United States

Case Details

Full title:Ivanjoel Aryeetey, Petitioner, v. United States of America, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Date published: Jul 13, 2020

Citations

15-cr-95 (AJN) (S.D.N.Y. Jul. 13, 2020)