From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Arthur v. Smith

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Jan 30, 2009
1 So. 3d 1184 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2009)

Opinion

No. 1D08-5013.

January 30, 2009.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Bradford County, Peter K. Sieg, Judge.

Daniel P. Arthur, and Florence D. Gata, pro se, Appellants.

James J. Taylor, Keystone Heights, for Appellees.


The Court has determined that the claims disposed of by the orders on appeal are inextricably intertwined with the claims and counterclaims that remain pending, and that the appeal is therefore premature. Cf. Mass. Life Ins. Co. v. Crapo, 918 So.2d 393 (Fla. 1st DCA 2006). Accordingly, the appellees' Motion to Dismiss Appeal as Premature, filed on November 5, 2008, is hereby granted and the appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. The appellants' Motion to Supplement the Record, filed in November 12, 2008, is denied.

WOLF, LEWIS, and ROBERTS, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Arthur v. Smith

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Jan 30, 2009
1 So. 3d 1184 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2009)
Case details for

Arthur v. Smith

Case Details

Full title:Daniel P. ARTHUR, and Florence D. Gata, Appellants, v. Stephen F. SMITH…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District

Date published: Jan 30, 2009

Citations

1 So. 3d 1184 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2009)