From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

ARTHUR v. ROAL

United States District Court, D. Minnesota
Aug 2, 2010
Civil No. 09-3043 (RHK/JSM) (D. Minn. Aug. 2, 2010)

Opinion

Civil No. 09-3043 (RHK/JSM).

August 2, 2010


ORDER


The above-entitled matter comes before the Court upon the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Janie S. Mayeron dated July 6, 2010. No objections have been filed to that Report and Recommendation in the time period permitted.

Based upon the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, and all of the files, records and proceedings herein, IT IS ORDERED:

1. The Report and Recommendation (Doc. No. 19) is ADOPTED;

2. The Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (Doc. No. 1) is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE; and

3. The Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings (Doc. No. 13) is DENIED.

LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY.


Summaries of

ARTHUR v. ROAL

United States District Court, D. Minnesota
Aug 2, 2010
Civil No. 09-3043 (RHK/JSM) (D. Minn. Aug. 2, 2010)
Case details for

ARTHUR v. ROAL

Case Details

Full title:Ronald A. Arthur, Petitioner, v. Warden Wendy J. Roal, Respondent

Court:United States District Court, D. Minnesota

Date published: Aug 2, 2010

Citations

Civil No. 09-3043 (RHK/JSM) (D. Minn. Aug. 2, 2010)

Citing Cases

United States v. Landsdown

IT IS SO ORDERED: Date: May 12, 2016 Although Defendant did not file his request as a petition for habeas…