From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Arthur v. Martin

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
Jan 22, 2013
3:11-cv-00804-HDM-WGC (D. Nev. Jan. 22, 2013)

Opinion

3:11-cv-00804-HDM-WGC

01-22-2013

GEORGE ARTHUR, Plaintiff, v. DOCTOR MARTIN, et al., Defendants


ORDER

Before the court is the report and recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge (#53), filed on November 29, 2012. In the report and recommendation, the magistrate judge recommends that this court enter an order denying the plaintiff's motions for Warden R. Baker at Ely State Prison to comply with Administrative Regulation 722.02-Legal Assistance by Inmates (#27; #40). Defendants objected (#29) and plaintiff replied(#48).

The court has considered the pleadings and memoranda of the parties and other relevant matters of record. Based on this review, the court hereby accepts and adopts the report and recommendation of the magistrate judge. Accordingly, the motions of the plaintiff, George Arthur (#27; #40) are DENIED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

_______________

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Arthur v. Martin

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
Jan 22, 2013
3:11-cv-00804-HDM-WGC (D. Nev. Jan. 22, 2013)
Case details for

Arthur v. Martin

Case Details

Full title:GEORGE ARTHUR, Plaintiff, v. DOCTOR MARTIN, et al., Defendants

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA

Date published: Jan 22, 2013

Citations

3:11-cv-00804-HDM-WGC (D. Nev. Jan. 22, 2013)