From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Arthur v. Martin

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
Jan 8, 2013
3:11-cv-00804-HDM-WGC (D. Nev. Jan. 8, 2013)

Opinion

3:11-cv-00804-HDM-WGC

01-08-2013

GEORGE ARTHUR, Plaintiff, v. DOCTOR MARTIN, et al., Defendants.


MINUTES OF THE COURT

PRESENT: THE HONORABLE WILLIAM G. COBB, U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE DEPUTY CLERK: KATIE LYNN OGDEN REPORTER: NONE APPEARING COUNSEL FOR PLAINTIFF(S): NONE APPEARING COUNSEL FOR DEFENDANT(S): NONE APPEARING

MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS:

Before the Court is Plaintiff's Plaintiff's Motion to Amend Civil Rights Complaint (Doc. # 54) and Defendants' Motion to Stay Scheduling Order Pending Resolution of Plaintiff's Motion to Amend Complaint ((Doc. # 55).

Although Plaintiff's motion is technically untimely, the court will address the substance of Plaintiff's motion at a status conference on a date to be set. In the meantime, the court agrees with Defendants that it would be advisable to stay further proceedings herein. Therefore, Defendants' motion (Doc. # 55) is GRANTED. The courtroom deputy shall schedule a status conference herein concerning Plaintiff's motion (Doc. # 54).

Pursuant to the Scheduling Order, any motion to amend was to be filed within 60 days of the May 30, 2012, Scheduling Order. (Doc. # 32 at ¶2.)

IT IS SO ORDERED.

LANCE S. WILSON, CLERK

By: _________________

Deputy Clerk


Summaries of

Arthur v. Martin

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
Jan 8, 2013
3:11-cv-00804-HDM-WGC (D. Nev. Jan. 8, 2013)
Case details for

Arthur v. Martin

Case Details

Full title:GEORGE ARTHUR, Plaintiff, v. DOCTOR MARTIN, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA

Date published: Jan 8, 2013

Citations

3:11-cv-00804-HDM-WGC (D. Nev. Jan. 8, 2013)