Summary
adopting recommendation of United States magistrate judge to deny Rule 54 motions without prejudice to renewal after disposition of appeal on the merits
Summary of this case from Trahan v. MelanconOpinion
Civil Action No. 3:99-CV-2355-R.
April 20, 2004
JUDGMENT
The Court has entered its Order Adopting the Conclusions and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge in this case. It is therefore ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED that "Plaintiff's Bill of Particulars Related to Attorneys' Fees," filed July 9, 2003, Defendants/Counter Plaintiffs/Intervening Plaintiffs' "Motion for Court Review of Clerk of Court's Taxation of Plaintiffs' Bill of Costs Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 54(d)(1), Objections to Plaintiffs' Bill of Costs and Request for Oral Argument," filed July 18, 2003, and "Defendants/Counter Plaintiffs and Intervening Plaintiffs' Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(a) Motion with Proposed Bill of Particulars as to Costs and Attorneys Fees," filed July 28, 2003, are hereby DENIED without prejudice to renewal after disposition of the appeal.