From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Arroyo v. Bedi

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, C.D. California
Jan 7, 2015
14-cv-09280-PA (VBK) (C.D. Cal. Jan. 7, 2015)

Opinion


Rafael Arroyo, Jr. v. Gurbachan S. Bedi, et al. No. 14-cv-09280-PA (VBK) United States District Court, Central District of California January 7, 2015

          ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE: DISMISSAL FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION

          PERCY ANDERSON, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

         Generally, defendants must answer the complaint within 21 days after service (60 days if the defendant is the United States). Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(a)(1).

         In the present case, it appears that this time period has not been met. Accordingly, the court, on its own motion, orders plaintiff to show cause in writing on or before why this action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. Pursuant to Rule 78 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the court finds that this matter is appropriate for submission without oral argument. The Order to Show Cause will stand submitted upon the filing of plaintiff s response. Failure to respond to this Order may result in the imposition of sanctions, including but not limited to dismissal of the complaint.


Summaries of

Arroyo v. Bedi

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, C.D. California
Jan 7, 2015
14-cv-09280-PA (VBK) (C.D. Cal. Jan. 7, 2015)
Case details for

Arroyo v. Bedi

Case Details

Full title:Rafael Arroyo, Jr. v. Gurbachan S. Bedi, et al.

Court:United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, C.D. California

Date published: Jan 7, 2015

Citations

14-cv-09280-PA (VBK) (C.D. Cal. Jan. 7, 2015)