From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Arroyo v. a & R Enter. of Orlando, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA ORLANDO DIVISION
Jan 26, 2012
CASE NO. 6:11-CV-1005-Orl-36KRS (M.D. Fla. Jan. 26, 2012)

Opinion

CASE NO. 6:11-CV-1005-Orl-36KRS

01-26-2012

YADIRA ARROYO, Plaintiff, v. A & R ENTERPRISE OF ORLANDO, INC., and ALLAM K. HATOUM, Defendants.


ORDER

This cause comes before the Court upon the Report and Recommendation filed by Magistrate Judge Karla R. Spaulding on January 11, 2012 (Doc. 19). In the Report and Recommendation, Judge Spaulding recommends that the Court grant, in part, the parties' Joint Motion for Approval of Settlement, filed on December 20, 2011 (Doc. 17), prohibit Plaintiff's counsel from withholding any of the $4,500.00 payable to the Plaintiff under the settlement agreement, and dismiss this case with prejudice. The parties filed a Joint Notice of Non-Objection to the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Spaulding on January 25, 2012 (Doc. 20).

After careful consideration of the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, in conjunction with an independent examination of the court file, the Court is of the opinion that the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation should be adopted, confirmed, and approved in all respects. The Court is satisfied that the settlement reached between Plaintiff Yadira Arroyo and Defendants is a "fair and reasonable resolution of a bona fide dispute" of the claims raised pursuant to the Fair Labor Standards Act. See Lynn's Food Stores, Inc. v. United States, 679 F.2d 1350, 1354 (11th Cir.1982); 29 U.S.C. § 216.

Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

1. The Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Doc. 19) is adopted, confirmed, and approved in all respects and is made a part of this order for all purposes, including appellate review.
2. The Joint Motion for Approval of Settlement (Doc. 17) is GRANTED in part. Counsel for Plaintiff is prohibited from withholding any portion of the $4,500.00 payable to Plaintiff under the settlement agreement pursuant to a contingent fee or otherwise, and must provide Plaintiff with a copy of the Court's Order. The Settlement (Doc. 17, Ex. A) is thereby APPROVED, as it constitutes a fair and reasonable resolution of a bona fide dispute. However, the Court declines to reserve jurisdiction to enforce the Settlement Agreement.
3. This action is DISMISSED, with prejudice.
4. The Clerk is directed to terminate any pending motions and deadlines, enter judgment accordingly, and close this case.

DONE AND ORDERED at Orlando, Florida, on January 26, 2012

_________________

Charlene Edwards Honeywell

United States District Judge

COPIES TO:

COUNSEL OF RECORD


Summaries of

Arroyo v. a & R Enter. of Orlando, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA ORLANDO DIVISION
Jan 26, 2012
CASE NO. 6:11-CV-1005-Orl-36KRS (M.D. Fla. Jan. 26, 2012)
Case details for

Arroyo v. a & R Enter. of Orlando, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:YADIRA ARROYO, Plaintiff, v. A & R ENTERPRISE OF ORLANDO, INC., and ALLAM…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA ORLANDO DIVISION

Date published: Jan 26, 2012

Citations

CASE NO. 6:11-CV-1005-Orl-36KRS (M.D. Fla. Jan. 26, 2012)