From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

ARROW v. FAYE

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Dec 16, 1982
422 So. 2d 932 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1982)

Opinion

No. 81-2560.

November 2, 1982. Rehearing Denied December 16, 1982.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Dade County, David L. Levy, J.

Alan E. Dubow, Coconut Grove, for appellants.

Saul T. Von Zamft, Coral Gables, for appellee.

Before SCHWARTZ, DANIEL S. PEARSON and FERGUSON, JJ.


It indisputably appears that this action for legal malpractice (arising from the appellee's alleged failure to prosecute appellants' action for personal injuries within the appropriate statute of limitations) was filed well within two years of the dismissal of the limitations-barred personal injury action and this court's affirmance of that dismissal. Therefore, to the extent that appellants' amended complaint was dismissed below as being without the two-year limitations period fixed for such an action, see § 95.11(4)(a), Fla. Stat. (1979), such dismissal was error. There being no other discernible basis for the order of dismissal, the order is reversed and the cause remanded for further proceedings.

Reversed and remanded.


Summaries of

ARROW v. FAYE

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Dec 16, 1982
422 So. 2d 932 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1982)
Case details for

ARROW v. FAYE

Case Details

Full title:LESTER ARROW AND FLORENCE ARROW, HIS WIFE, APPELLANTS, v. LAURENCE D…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: Dec 16, 1982

Citations

422 So. 2d 932 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1982)

Citing Cases

Hampton v. Payne

In examining this provision, we have previously held that the statute of limitations for legal malpractice…