From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Arrow Carrier Corp. v. United States

U.S.
Jan 20, 1964
375 U.S. 452 (1964)

Opinion

APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY.

No. 467.

Decided January 20, 1964.

219 F. Supp. 43, affirmed.

Christian V. Graf for appellant.

Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Orrick, Lionel Kestenbaum, Robert W. Ginnane and H. Neil Garson for the United States and the Interstate Commerce Commission.

William A. Goichman, Joseph C. Bruno and Edward Munce for the Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission.

Ernest R. von Starck, Robert H. Young and Carl Helmetag, Jr. for the Pennsylvania Railroad Co. et al.


The motion of Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission to be added as a party appellee is granted. The motion to correct the caption to include the Pennsylvania Railroad Company, Highway Express Lines, Inc., and Modern Transfer Co., Inc., as parties appellee is granted. The motions to affirm are granted and the judgment is affirmed.


Summaries of

Arrow Carrier Corp. v. United States

U.S.
Jan 20, 1964
375 U.S. 452 (1964)
Case details for

Arrow Carrier Corp. v. United States

Case Details

Full title:ARROW CARRIER CORP. v . UNITED STATES ET AL

Court:U.S.

Date published: Jan 20, 1964

Citations

375 U.S. 452 (1964)

Citing Cases

Service Trucking Company v. United States

As we have stated, Service makes no claim that the findings of fact made by the Commission are not supported…

Leonard Express, Inc. v. United States

Through indiscriminate quoting out of context, omitting the explanatory phrase "not bona fide interstate,"…