From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Arrington v. State

United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Western Division, at Dayton
Jul 25, 2006
Case No. 3:06-cv-183 (S.D. Ohio Jul. 25, 2006)

Opinion

Case No. 3:06-cv-183.

July 25, 2006


ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS


The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendations of United States Magistrate Judge Michael R. Merz (Doc. #3), to whom this case was referred pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b), and noting that no objections have been filed thereto and that the time for filing such objections under Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(b) expired on July 7, 2006, hereby ADOPTS said Report and Recommendations.

Accordingly, the Court shall adopt the Report and Recommendations, finding that the Petition is barred by the statute of limitations. The Clerk shall enter judgment dismissing the Petition with prejudice.


Summaries of

Arrington v. State

United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Western Division, at Dayton
Jul 25, 2006
Case No. 3:06-cv-183 (S.D. Ohio Jul. 25, 2006)
Case details for

Arrington v. State

Case Details

Full title:MELVIN C. ARRINGTON, Petitioner, v. STATE OF OHIO, Respondent

Court:United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Western Division, at Dayton

Date published: Jul 25, 2006

Citations

Case No. 3:06-cv-183 (S.D. Ohio Jul. 25, 2006)