From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Arrington v. Mediko, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA ROANOKE DIVISION
Oct 19, 2017
Civil Action No. 7:17-cv-00132 (W.D. Va. Oct. 19, 2017)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 7:17-cv-00132

10-19-2017

JONATHAN AUBREY ARRINGTON, Plaintiff, v. MEDIKO, INC., Defendant(s).


MEMORANDUM OPINION

Jonathan Aubrey Arlington, proceeding pro se, filed a civil rights complaint, pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. By Order entered September 27, 2017, the court directed plaintiff to submit within twenty days from the date of the Order the remaining balance of the filing fee or otherwise respond. Plaintiff was advised that a failure to comply would result in dismissal of this action without prejudice.

More than 20 days have elapsed, and plaintiff has failed to comply with the described conditions. Accordingly, the court dismisses the action without prejudice and strikes the case from the active docket of the court. Plaintiff may refile the claims in a separate action once plaintiff is prepared to comply with the noted conditions.

The Clerk is directed to send a copy of this Memorandum Opinion and accompanying Order to plaintiff.

ENTER: This 19th day of October, 2017.

/s/_________

Senior United States District Judge


Summaries of

Arrington v. Mediko, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA ROANOKE DIVISION
Oct 19, 2017
Civil Action No. 7:17-cv-00132 (W.D. Va. Oct. 19, 2017)
Case details for

Arrington v. Mediko, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:JONATHAN AUBREY ARRINGTON, Plaintiff, v. MEDIKO, INC., Defendant(s).

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA ROANOKE DIVISION

Date published: Oct 19, 2017

Citations

Civil Action No. 7:17-cv-00132 (W.D. Va. Oct. 19, 2017)