From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Arriaga v. Capra

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Sep 28, 2017
153 A.D.3d 1542 (N.Y. App. Div. 2017)

Opinion

09-28-2017

In the Matter of Anthony ARRIAGA, Petitioner, v. Michael CAPRA, as Superintendent of Sing Sing Correctional Facility, Respondent.

Anthony Arriaga, Ossining, petitioner pro se. Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, Albany (Marcus J. Mastracco of counsel), for respondent.


Anthony Arriaga, Ossining, petitioner pro se.

Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, Albany (Marcus J. Mastracco of counsel), for respondent.

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of respondent finding petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.

Petitioner commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding challenging a tier II determination finding him guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules. The Attorney General has advised this Court that the determination has since been administratively reversed, all references thereto have been expunged from petitioner's institutional record and the mandatory $5 surcharge has been refunded to petitioner's inmate account. In view of this, petitioner has been granted all the relief to which he is entitled and the petition must be dismissed as moot (see Matter of Slide v. Russo, 151 A.D.3d 1518, 1518, 54 N.Y.S.3d 605 [2017]; Matter of Tolliver v. Fischer, 140 A.D.3d 1507, 1508, 33 N.Y.S.3d 773 [2016] ).

ADJUDGED that the petition is dismissed, as moot, without costs.

PETERS, P.J., EGAN JR., CLARK, MULVEY and PRITZKER, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Arriaga v. Capra

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Sep 28, 2017
153 A.D.3d 1542 (N.Y. App. Div. 2017)
Case details for

Arriaga v. Capra

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of Anthony ARRIAGA, Petitioner, v. Michael CAPRA, as…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.

Date published: Sep 28, 2017

Citations

153 A.D.3d 1542 (N.Y. App. Div. 2017)
153 A.D.3d 1542

Citing Cases

Nova v. Venettozzi

The Attorney General has advised this Court that the determination has been administratively reversed, all…

Maye v. Venettozzi

We note that the loss of good time imposed as part of the penalty should also be restored to petitioner (see…