From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Arrandondo v. Roy

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA
Nov 27, 2012
Civ. No. 12-2576 (PAM/SER) (D. Minn. Nov. 27, 2012)

Opinion

Civ. No. 12-2576 (PAM/SER)

11-27-2012

John Excel Arrandondo, Petitioner, v. Tom Roy, Commissioner of Correction, Respondent.


ORDER

This matter is before the Court on the Report and Recommendation ("R&R") of Magistrate Judge Steven E. Rau dated November 2, 2012. In the R&R, Magistrate Judge Rau recommended that the Court deny Petitioner's application to proceed in forma pauperis, deny the Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus as untimely, and summarily dismiss the case with prejudice. Petitioner failed to file objections to the R&R in the time period permitted. The Court therefore ADOPTS the R&R (Docket No. 8).

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Docket No. 1) is DENIED;
2. Petitioner's application to proceed in forma pauperis (Docket No. 3) is DENIED;
3. This action is DISMISSED with prejudice; and
4. Petitioner will not be granted a Certificate of Appealability.

LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY.

_______________

Paul A. Magnuson

United States District Court Judge


Summaries of

Arrandondo v. Roy

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA
Nov 27, 2012
Civ. No. 12-2576 (PAM/SER) (D. Minn. Nov. 27, 2012)
Case details for

Arrandondo v. Roy

Case Details

Full title:John Excel Arrandondo, Petitioner, v. Tom Roy, Commissioner of Correction…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA

Date published: Nov 27, 2012

Citations

Civ. No. 12-2576 (PAM/SER) (D. Minn. Nov. 27, 2012)