From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Arranco Shoes v. Calzados Milady S.L

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Dec 8, 1982
422 So. 2d 341 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1982)

Opinion

No. 82-1262.

November 9, 1982. Rehearing Denied December 8, 1982.

Appeal from a non-final order from Circuit Court, Dade County; Phillip W. Knight, Judge.

Silver, Levy Hershoff and Jay M. Levy, Miami, for appellant.

William Phillips and Henry W. Clar, Miami, for appellee.

Before HENDRY, BASKIN and FERGUSON, JJ.


Finding no excusable neglect which might justify appellant's failure to respond to process properly served upon its employee during the lengthy period appellant's business was left in the care of its employee, and finding no abuse of discretion by the trial court, T.I.E. Communications, Inc. v. Toyota Motors Center, Inc., 391 So.2d 697 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980); Williams v. Stack, 366 So.2d 872 (Fla. 4th DCA 1979), we affirm the trial court's denial of appellant's Motion to Set Aside Default and Default Judgment.

We remand, however, for a new trial on the question of damages. Appellant was not afforded notice of trial on the issue of damages. Tallman Pools of Georgia, Inc. v. Wood, 399 So.2d 112 (Fla. 1st DCA 1981); Scott v. Johnson, 386 So.2d 67 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980); B/G Amusements, Inc. v. Mystery Fun House, Inc., 381 So.2d 318 (Fla. 5th DCA 1980); Fla.R.Civ.P. 1.440(c).

Affirmed in part, reversed in part.


Summaries of

Arranco Shoes v. Calzados Milady S.L

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Dec 8, 1982
422 So. 2d 341 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1982)
Case details for

Arranco Shoes v. Calzados Milady S.L

Case Details

Full title:ARRANCO SHOES BY CARMEN, INC., A FLORIDA CORPORATION, APPELLANT, v…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: Dec 8, 1982

Citations

422 So. 2d 341 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1982)

Citing Cases

California Club Realty, Inc. v. Lucca

This being so, it follows that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying the defendant's motion…