From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Arpino v. State

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
Jul 23, 2014
No. 65907 (Nev. Jul. 23, 2014)

Opinion

No. 65907

07-23-2014

JOHN FRANCIS ARPINO, Petitioner, v. THE STATE OF NEVADA; RICHARD A. GAMMICK; SCOTT W. EDWARDS; AND ROBERT C. BELL, Respondents.


An unpublished order shall not be regarded as precedent and shall not be cited as legal authority. SCR 123.

ORDER DENYING PETITION

This is a proper person petition for a writ of prohibition. Petitioner argues that the District Attorney has not paid his bond pursuant to NRS 252.030. Petitioner seeks an order directing the District Attorney Office's to cease and desist acting on behalf of the State of Nevada, reversal of his criminal conviction, and payment of damages. Without deciding upon the merits of any claims raised in the documents submitted in this matter, we decline to exercise our original jurisdiction. See NRS 34.320; NRS 34.330; NRS 34.020.

The petition contains a claim that is submitted for the purpose of harassing his opponent, see NRS 209.451(d)(1), and contains allegations of fact for which no evidentiary proof is provided or is likely to be available after further investigation, see NRS 209.451(d)(3). We caution petitioner that he may be referred for the forfeiture of credits for the filing of a frivolous petition. Accordingly, we

ORDER the petition DENIED.

___________, J.

Pickering

___________, J.

Parraguirre

___________, J.

Saitta
cc: John Francis Arpino

Washoe County District Attorney

Robert C. Bell

Scott W. Edwards

Attorney General/Carson City

Washoe District Court Clerk


Summaries of

Arpino v. State

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
Jul 23, 2014
No. 65907 (Nev. Jul. 23, 2014)
Case details for

Arpino v. State

Case Details

Full title:JOHN FRANCIS ARPINO, Petitioner, v. THE STATE OF NEVADA; RICHARD A…

Court:SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

Date published: Jul 23, 2014

Citations

No. 65907 (Nev. Jul. 23, 2014)

Citing Cases

Arpino v. Edwards

In response, Arpino moved for relief from that judgment pursuant to NRCP 60(b)(3), repeating an argument that…