From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Arpino v. Second Judicial Dist. Court of State

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
Jul 21, 2015
No. 68125 (Nev. Jul. 21, 2015)

Opinion

No. 68125

07-21-2015

JOHN FRANCIS ARPINO, Petitioner, v. THE SECOND JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA, IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF WASHOE; AND THE HONORABLE PATRICK FLANAGAN, DISTRICT JUDGE, Respondents.


An unpublished order shall not be regarded as precedent and shall not be cited as legal authority. SCR 123.

ORDER DENYING PETITION

This is a pro se petition for a writ of mandamus. Petitioner complains that the district court's order denying his motion to correct an illegal sentence lacked findings of fact or conclusions of law, and he seeks an order compelling the district court to issue "a proper decision." We have reviewed the documents submitted in this matter, and without deciding upon the merits of any claims raised therein, we decline to exercise original jurisdiction in this matter. See NRS 34.160; NRS 34.170. Accordingly, we

ORDER the petition DENIED.

/s/_________, J.

Saitta
/s/_________, J.
Gibbons
/s/_________, J.
Pickering
cc: Hon. Patrick Flanagan, District Judge

John Francis Arpino

Attorney General/Carson City

Washoe District Court Clerk


Summaries of

Arpino v. Second Judicial Dist. Court of State

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
Jul 21, 2015
No. 68125 (Nev. Jul. 21, 2015)
Case details for

Arpino v. Second Judicial Dist. Court of State

Case Details

Full title:JOHN FRANCIS ARPINO, Petitioner, v. THE SECOND JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF…

Court:SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

Date published: Jul 21, 2015

Citations

No. 68125 (Nev. Jul. 21, 2015)