From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Arpin v. Consol. Rail Co.

Supreme Court of Ohio
Feb 23, 2017
69 N.E.3d 752 (Ohio 2017)

Opinion

NO. 2017-0171

02-23-2017

Arpin v. Consol. Rail Co.


MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS

Cuyahoga App. No. 104279, 2016-Ohio-8313. This cause is pending before the court as a jurisdictional appeal.

Upon consideration of the motion for admission pro hac vice of Dan Himmelfarb, it is ordered by the court that the motion is granted. Pursuant to Gov.Bar R. XII(4), counsel shall file a notice of permission to appear pro hac vice with the Supreme Court's Office of Attorney Services within 30 days of the date of this entry.


Summaries of

Arpin v. Consol. Rail Co.

Supreme Court of Ohio
Feb 23, 2017
69 N.E.3d 752 (Ohio 2017)
Case details for

Arpin v. Consol. Rail Co.

Case Details

Full title:Arpin v. Consol. Rail Co.

Court:Supreme Court of Ohio

Date published: Feb 23, 2017

Citations

69 N.E.3d 752 (Ohio 2017)
148 Ohio St. 3d 1414
2017 Ohio 644