From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Arocha v. Diaz

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Mar 24, 2023
2:22-cv-0638 KJM CKD P (E.D. Cal. Mar. 24, 2023)

Opinion

2:22-cv-0638 KJM CKD P

03-24-2023

RUDY AROCHA, Plaintiff, v. RALPH M. DIAZ, Defendant.


ORDER

CAROLYN K. DELANEY, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Plaintiff has requested an extension of time to file a motion for an award of attorney's fees. To the extent plaintiff seeks attorney's fees under provisions of California law, such provisions are not applicable in this court. To the extent plaintiff seeks attorney's fees pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1988, pro se litigants are not entitled to an award of attorney's fees under that statute. Kay v. Ehrler, 499 U.S. 432, 435 (1991). Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's request for an extension of time to file a motion for an award of attorney's fees (ECF No. 17) is denied.


Summaries of

Arocha v. Diaz

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Mar 24, 2023
2:22-cv-0638 KJM CKD P (E.D. Cal. Mar. 24, 2023)
Case details for

Arocha v. Diaz

Case Details

Full title:RUDY AROCHA, Plaintiff, v. RALPH M. DIAZ, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Mar 24, 2023

Citations

2:22-cv-0638 KJM CKD P (E.D. Cal. Mar. 24, 2023)