From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Arnold v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
Apr 26, 2012
86 So. 3d 1124 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2012)

Opinion

No. 2D12–1634.

2012-04-26

Christopher L. ARNOLD, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).


BY ORDER OF THE COURT.

The petition for writ of mandamus is dismissed because the records of the lower tribunal indicate that the petitioner is represented by counsel. See Logan v. State, 846 So.2d 472 (Fla .2003). Petitioner may challenge this conclusion by filing a motion for rehearing, under oath, within 15 days of the date of this order.

DAVIS, LaROSE, and KHOUZAM, JJ., Concur.


Summaries of

Arnold v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
Apr 26, 2012
86 So. 3d 1124 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2012)
Case details for

Arnold v. State

Case Details

Full title:Christopher L. ARNOLD, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Date published: Apr 26, 2012

Citations

86 So. 3d 1124 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2012)