From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Arnold v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Jan 26, 1990
555 So. 2d 972 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1990)

Opinion

No. 88-01417.

January 26, 1990.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Polk County; Carolyn K. Fulmer, Judge.

James Marion Moorman, Public Defender, and Lawrence D. Shearer, Asst. Public Defender, Bartow, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Charles Corces, Jr., Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for appellee.


We affirm appellant's conviction for purchase of cocaine on the authority of Blankenship v. State, 545 So.2d 908 (Fla. 2d DCA 1989). As in Blankenship we certify to the Florida Supreme Court the following question, which we deem to be of great public importance:

Section 893.13, Florida Statutes (1987), as amended by chapter 87-243, Laws of Florida.

DOES SECTION 893.13, FLORIDA STATUTES (1987), VIOLATE THE ONE SUBJECT RULE OF THE FLORIDA CONSTITUTION?

CAMPBELL, C.J., and RYDER and DANAHY, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Arnold v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Jan 26, 1990
555 So. 2d 972 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1990)
Case details for

Arnold v. State

Case Details

Full title:JOHN E. ARNOLD, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District

Date published: Jan 26, 1990

Citations

555 So. 2d 972 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1990)