Arnold v. Potter, Hamilton Butler, Inc.

Full title: DAN H. ARNOLD, Appellant, v. POTTER, HAMILTON BUTLER, INC., Respondent

Court: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Jun 1, 1929

226 App. Div. 868 (N.Y. App. Div. 1929)

Opinion

June, 1929.

Present — Dowling, P.J., Merrell, Martin, O'Malley and Proskauer, JJ.

Judgment affirmed. Assuming that the question whether there was a loan to the defendant corporation, rather than an investment by the plaintiff, should have been submitted to the jury, the plaintiff failed to show that the loan was authorized by the defendant.