From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Arnold v. Elk Grove Unified Sch. Dist.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jan 22, 2013
Case No.: 2:12-cv-02431-MCE-GGH (E.D. Cal. Jan. 22, 2013)

Opinion

Case No.: 2:12-cv-02431-MCE-GGH

01-22-2013

CONNIE ARNOLD, an individual; Plaintiff, v. ELK GROVE UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT; SACRAMENTO WORKS, INC.; SACRAMENTO EMPLOYMENT & TRAINING AGENCY ("SETA") and DOES 1 - 10, inclusive Defendants.

WILSON, ELSER, MOSKOWITZ, EDELMAN & DICKER LLP RALPH W. ROBINSON GRACE R. NEISINGH Attorneys for Defendants Sacramento Works, Inc., and Sacramento Employment & Training Agency BARBOSA GROUP PATRICIA BARBOSA (as authorized January 22, 2013) Attorney for Plaintiff Connie Arnold


RALPH W. ROBINSON (SBN 51436)
ralph.robinson@wilsonelser.com
GRACE R. NEISINGH (SBN 276128)
grace.neisingh@wilsonelser.com
WILSON, ELSER, MOSKOWITZ,
EDELMAN & DICKER LLP
525 Market Street, 17th Floor
San Francisco, California 94105
Telephone: (415) 433-0990
Facsimile: (415) 434-1370
Attorneys for Defendants Sacramento Works, Inc.,
and Sacramento Employment & Training Agency
PATRICIA BARBOSA (SBN 125865)
BARBOSA GROUP
20472 Alisa Lane
Huntington Beach, California 92646
Telephone: (714) 465-9486
PBarbosa@barbosagrp.com
Attorney for Plaintiff Connie Arnold

STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR

DISMISSAL OF SACRAMENTO

WORKS, INC. WITHOUT PREJUDICE

In connection with the above-captioned action, and pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between Plaintiff CONNIE ARNOLD and Defendants SACRAMENTO WORKS, INC. that:

(1) Defendants Sacramento Works, Inc shall be dismissed without prejudice as a defendant in this action;

(2) As of the filing of this stipulation, Defendant Sacramento Works, Inc. was served with the first amended complaint and on or about November 27, 2012. The parties stipulated to extend the time to answer by not more than 28 days. The deadline to answer is January 15, 2013. Defendant Sacramento Works, Inc. has not filed an answer or any motion pursuant to Rule 12 or Rule 56 in this action;

(3) The caption of this action shall be modified accordingly.

WILSON, ELSER, MOSKOWITZ, EDELMAN &

DICKER LLP

_________________

RALPH W. ROBINSON

GRACE R. NEISINGH

Attorneys for Defendants Sacramento Works, Inc.,

and Sacramento Employment & Training Agency

BARBOSA GROUP

_________________

PATRICIA BARBOSA (as authorized January 22,

2013)

Attorney for Plaintiff Connie Arnold

IT IS SO ORDERED

_________________

MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR., CHIEF JUDGE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT


Summaries of

Arnold v. Elk Grove Unified Sch. Dist.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jan 22, 2013
Case No.: 2:12-cv-02431-MCE-GGH (E.D. Cal. Jan. 22, 2013)
Case details for

Arnold v. Elk Grove Unified Sch. Dist.

Case Details

Full title:CONNIE ARNOLD, an individual; Plaintiff, v. ELK GROVE UNIFIED SCHOOL…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Jan 22, 2013

Citations

Case No.: 2:12-cv-02431-MCE-GGH (E.D. Cal. Jan. 22, 2013)