From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Arnold v. Comm'r of Internal Revenue

United States Tax Court
Mar 14, 2022
No. 24568-21S (U.S.T.C. Mar. 14, 2022)

Opinion

24568-21S

03-14-2022

Melinda B. Arnold Petitioner v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue Respondent


ORDER OF DISMISSAL FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION

Maurice B. Foley Chief Judge.

On November 22, 2021, respondent filed in the above-docketed case a Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction, on the ground that no valid notice of deficiency, as authorized by section 6212 and required by section 6213(a) of the Internal Revenue Code to form the basis for a petition to this Court, had been issued to petitioner with respect to taxable year 2018. In the motion to dismiss, respondent explained that petitioner had already paid the amount of the deficiency underlying this proceeding prior to the issuance of the purported notice referenced in the petition herein. The determined amount thus failed to qualify as a deficiency within the meaning of the governing provisions of the Internal Revenue Code. In the petition commending this proceeding, petitioner had made the substantially identical allegation that the taxes had already been paid.

Upon due consideration, it is

ORDERED that respondent's Motion To Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction is granted, and this case is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction on the ground that the purported notice of deficiency is invalid.


Summaries of

Arnold v. Comm'r of Internal Revenue

United States Tax Court
Mar 14, 2022
No. 24568-21S (U.S.T.C. Mar. 14, 2022)
Case details for

Arnold v. Comm'r of Internal Revenue

Case Details

Full title:Melinda B. Arnold Petitioner v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue Respondent

Court:United States Tax Court

Date published: Mar 14, 2022

Citations

No. 24568-21S (U.S.T.C. Mar. 14, 2022)