From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Arnold v. City of Florissant

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Four
Mar 8, 1994
871 S.W.2d 145 (Mo. Ct. App. 1994)

Opinion

No. 64420.

March 8, 1994.

APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF ST. LOUIS COUNTY; STEVEN H. GOLDMAN, JUDGE.

Althea Johns, St. Louis, for appellant.

John Michael Hessel, St. Louis, for respondent.

Before GRIMM, P.J., and CARL R. GAERTNER and AHRENS, JJ.


ORDER


Appellant, a police officer of the City of Florissant, appeals the judgment of the circuit court affirming the disciplinary action imposed against him by the Florissant Personnel Commission. The Commission's decision was supported by competent and substantial evidence, was not arbitrary, capricious, or unreasonable, and is not in violation of constitutional provisions or in excess of statutory authority. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. However the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information setting forth the facts and reasons for which the trial court's judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).


Summaries of

Arnold v. City of Florissant

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Four
Mar 8, 1994
871 S.W.2d 145 (Mo. Ct. App. 1994)
Case details for

Arnold v. City of Florissant

Case Details

Full title:STAN ARNOLD, APPELLANT, v. THE CITY OF FLORISSANT, RESPONDENT

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Four

Date published: Mar 8, 1994

Citations

871 S.W.2d 145 (Mo. Ct. App. 1994)