From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Arnold v. Bostwick Banking Company

Court of Appeals of Georgia
Jan 13, 1971
179 S.E.2d 675 (Ga. Ct. App. 1971)

Opinion

44972.

DECIDED JANUARY 13, 1971.

Action on note. Calhoun Superior Court. Before Judge Culpepper.

E. Louis Adams, for appellants.

Twitty Twitty, Frank S. Twitty, for appellee.


The Supreme Court in Bostwick Banking Co. v. Arnold, 227 Ga. 18, having reversed the judgment of this court in Arnold v. Bostwick Banking Co., 121 Ga. App. 131 ( 173 S.E.2d 236), wherein it was held that a jury might determine from the evidence submitted on summary judgment that the plaintiff had made material alterations in filling in the balance of the notes, as he was required to do in completing the blanks in the same which could avoid the instrument under the Uniform Commercial Code ( Code Ann. §§ 109A-3-306, 109A-3 — 407; Ga. L. 1962, pp. 156, 255, 259), our judgment reversing the trial court is vacated and set aside. The ruling made by the Supreme Court is made the judgment here. Accordingly, the trial judge did not err in granting the motion for summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff.

Judgment affirmed. Hall, P. J., and Deen, J., concur.


DECIDED JANUARY 13, 1971.


Summaries of

Arnold v. Bostwick Banking Company

Court of Appeals of Georgia
Jan 13, 1971
179 S.E.2d 675 (Ga. Ct. App. 1971)
Case details for

Arnold v. Bostwick Banking Company

Case Details

Full title:ARNOLD et al. v. BOSTWICK BANKING COMPANY

Court:Court of Appeals of Georgia

Date published: Jan 13, 1971

Citations

179 S.E.2d 675 (Ga. Ct. App. 1971)
123 Ga. App. 189

Citing Cases

Glass Elec. Co., v. Commercial Union Ins.

A contractual limitations period found in an insurance contract may be waived under certain circumstances.…

Virginia Mut. v. Price

As to appellee Price, the copy of the fire insurance policy concerned was mailed to him at the wrong address…