From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Arnold v. Astrue

United States District Court, N.D. Ohio, Eastern Division
Jan 27, 2011
Case No. 1:06 CV 1625 (N.D. Ohio Jan. 27, 2011)

Opinion

Case No. 1:06 CV 1625.

January 27, 2011


MEMORANDUM OF OPINION AND ORDER


On July 16, 2007, the Court adopted Magistrate Judge Perelman's recommendation and remanded Plaintiff Larry Arnold's Social Security Income ("SSI") appeal for further proceedings, finding that the Administrative Law Judge's decision denying Arnold's application for SSI was not supported by substantial evidence. (Doc ##: 21, 22.) On November 18, 2010, Arnold's attorney, Marcia Margolius, Esq., filed the pending Motion for Attorney Fees Pursuant to 20 C.F.R. §§ 416.1525 and 416.1528, seeking an award of $5,775 (the "Motion"). ( Doc #: 23.) Shortly thereafter, the Court referred the case to Magistrate Judge McHargh for preparation of a report and recommendation. (Doc #: 24.) On December 2, 2010, the Defendant Commissioner of Social Security filed notice that it had no objection to the Motion. (Doc. #: 25.)

Magistrate Judge McHargh has now issued a Report and Recommendation, recommending that the undersigned grant the pending Motion as Attorney Margolius' request falls well within the parameters set forth in 42 U.S.C. § 406(b) and Sixth Circuit case law (the "R R"). ( Doc #: 26.) The Commissioner has responded that he will not be filing objections to the R R. (Doc #: 27.)

Due to the thoroughness of the Magistrate Judge's R R and the Commissioner's lack of objections, the Court hereby ADOPTS the R R ( Doc #: 26), GRANTS the Motion for Attorney Fees Pursuant to 20 C.F.R. §§ 416.1525 and 416.1528 ( Doc #: 23), and AWARDS Attorney Margolius the requested $5,775.00 in attorney fees.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

January 27, 2011


Summaries of

Arnold v. Astrue

United States District Court, N.D. Ohio, Eastern Division
Jan 27, 2011
Case No. 1:06 CV 1625 (N.D. Ohio Jan. 27, 2011)
Case details for

Arnold v. Astrue

Case Details

Full title:LARRY ARNOLD, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL ASTRUE, Comm'r of Social Security…

Court:United States District Court, N.D. Ohio, Eastern Division

Date published: Jan 27, 2011

Citations

Case No. 1:06 CV 1625 (N.D. Ohio Jan. 27, 2011)

Citing Cases

Tarr v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec.

Id. The court should keep in mind that an attorney may receive the full 25% contingency fee under contract…

Bowman v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec.

However, deductions for large fees are permissible if: 1) there is improper conduct or ineffectiveness of…