From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Arnell Group Ltd. v. Danskin, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Nov 29, 2001
288 A.D.2d 156 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)

Opinion

November 29, 2001.

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Sheila Abdus-Salaam, J.), entered November 8, 2000, which, insofar as appealed from, denied plaintiff's motion for summary judgment, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Mark W. Moody, for plaintiff-appellant.

Timothy N. Tanner, for defendant-respondent.

Before: Mazzarelli, J.P., Andrias, Ellerin, Buckley, Marlow, JJ.


Issues of fact exist as to whether plaintiff agreed to treat defendant's prepayment of one-half of the estimate for the fall 1999 photo shoot project as payment in full in light of defendant's dissatisfaction with plaintiff's work, and whether the parties agreed to a balance due after their relationship was terminated. We have considered plaintiff's other contentions and find them unavailing.

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.


Summaries of

Arnell Group Ltd. v. Danskin, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Nov 29, 2001
288 A.D.2d 156 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)
Case details for

Arnell Group Ltd. v. Danskin, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:ARNELL GROUP LTD., ETC., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. DANSKIN, INC.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Nov 29, 2001

Citations

288 A.D.2d 156 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)
733 N.Y.S.2d 351

Citing Cases

Steele v. 400 East 77th Street Corp.

A proponent of a summary judgment motion must make a prima facie showing of entitlement to judgment as a…