Armstrong v. Young

Full title: BRADY ARMSTRONG, Plaintiff, v. D. YOUNG, et al., Defendants.

Court: United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California

Date published: Jul 26, 2013

12-cv-0123-TLN KJN P (E.D. Cal. Jul. 26, 2013)

Opinion

BRADY ARMSTRONG, Plaintiff, v. D. YOUNG, et al., Defendants. No. 12-cv-0123-TLN KJN P United States District Court, E.D. California. July 26, 2013

          ORDER

          TROY L. NUNLEY, District Judge.

         Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.

         On June 27, 2013, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Neither party has filed objections to the findings and recommendations.

         The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by the magistrate judge's analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

         1. The findings and recommendations filed June 27, 2013, are adopted in full;

         2. Defendant Chandler's motion to dismiss (ECF No. 29) is granted; and

         3. Defendant Chandler is dismissed from this action.