Armstrong v. Young

Full title: BRADY ARMSTRONG, Plaintiff, v. D. YOUNG, et al., Defendants.

Court: United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California

Date published: Oct 2, 2013

12-cv-0123 TLN KJN P (E.D. Cal. Oct. 2, 2013)

Opinion

BRADY ARMSTRONG, Plaintiff, v. D. YOUNG, et al., Defendants. No. 12-cv-0123 TLN KJN P United States District Court, E.D. California. October 2, 2013

          ORDER

          TROY L. NUNLEY, District Judge.

         Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.

         On July 17, 2013, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Neither party has filed objections to the findings and recommendations.

         The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by the magistrate judge's analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

         1. The findings and recommendations filed July 17, 2013 (ECF No. 49), are adopted in full; and

         2. Plaintiff's July 6, 2013, request for injunctive relief (ECF No. 48) is denied without prejudice.