From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Armstrong v. Warden, Lebanon Corr. Inst.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION
Nov 12, 2013
Case No. 3:13-cv-335 (S.D. Ohio Nov. 12, 2013)

Opinion

Case No. 3:13-cv-335

11-12-2013

A.D. ARMSTRONG, Petitioner, v. WARDEN, LEBANON CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION, Respondent.


JUDGE WALTER H. RICE

DECISION AND ENTRY ADOPTING UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE

JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS (DOC. #6);

DISMISSING PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS (DOC. #2)

WITH PREJUDICE; JUDGMENT TO ENTER IN FAVOR OF

RESPONDENT AND AGAINST PETITIONER; DENYING CERTIFICATE

OF APPEALABILITY AND LEAVE TO APPEAL IN FORMA PAUPERIS;

TERMINATION ENTRY

On October 15, 2013, United States Magistrate Judge Michael Merz issued a Report and Recommendations (Doc. #6), recommending that A.D. Armstrong's Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Doc. #2) be dismissed with prejudice, and that Petitioner be denied a certificate of appealability. Although the parties were given notice of their right to file objections to the Report and Recommendations, and of their consequences for failing to do so, no objections have been filed within the time allotted.

On October 23, 2013, the Court did receive a letter from Petitioner complaining about excessive force by corrections officers at the prison. This letter, however, raises no objections to the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendations.

Based on the reasoning and citations of authority set forth by United States Magistrate Judge Michael R. Merz, in his October 15, 2013, Report and Recommendations (Doc. #6), as well as upon a thorough de novo review of this Court's file and the applicable law, this Court ADOPTS said judicial filing in its entirety. The Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus (Doc. #2) is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.

Given that Petitioner has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right and, further, that the Court's decision herein would not be debatable among reasonable jurists, and because any appeal from this Court's decision would be objectively frivolous, Petitioner is denied a certificate of appealability and denied leave to appeal in forma pauperis.

Judgment will be entered in favor of Respondent and against Petitioner.

The captioned case is hereby ordered terminated upon the docket records of the United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio, Western Division, at Dayton.

_______________

WALTER H. RICE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Armstrong v. Warden, Lebanon Corr. Inst.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION
Nov 12, 2013
Case No. 3:13-cv-335 (S.D. Ohio Nov. 12, 2013)
Case details for

Armstrong v. Warden, Lebanon Corr. Inst.

Case Details

Full title:A.D. ARMSTRONG, Petitioner, v. WARDEN, LEBANON CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION

Date published: Nov 12, 2013

Citations

Case No. 3:13-cv-335 (S.D. Ohio Nov. 12, 2013)