From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Armstrong v. Swanson

United States District Court, D. Colorado
Mar 11, 2008
Civil Action No. 08-cv-00194-MSK-MEH (D. Colo. Mar. 11, 2008)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 08-cv-00194-MSK-MEH.

March 11, 2008


ORDER


THIS MATTER is before the Court on the Unopposed Motion to Withdraw as Counsel (Supplemental With Proposed Order) (#19). The Motion is GRANTED. Mark K. Burton and Randy C. Canney are withdrawn as counsel of record for Plaintiff.

Plaintiff is advised that, unless and until a new attorney enters an appearance on his behalf, he is personally responsible for continuing to defend and prosecute the claims in this case. That responsibility includes, but is not limited to, reviewing and complying with all past and present court orders and complying with any deadlines created by the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the District of Colorado Local Rules of Civil Procedure, this Court's Practice Standards, and any other rules that may be applicable. Failure to comply with orders or deadlines may result in the imposition of sanctions, up to an including entry of default on the claims asserted against him, and dismissal of his counterclaims.


Summaries of

Armstrong v. Swanson

United States District Court, D. Colorado
Mar 11, 2008
Civil Action No. 08-cv-00194-MSK-MEH (D. Colo. Mar. 11, 2008)
Case details for

Armstrong v. Swanson

Case Details

Full title:THOMAS C. ARMSTRONG, Plaintiff, v. DANIEL SWANSON, JARROD FOUST, JOHN…

Court:United States District Court, D. Colorado

Date published: Mar 11, 2008

Citations

Civil Action No. 08-cv-00194-MSK-MEH (D. Colo. Mar. 11, 2008)