From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Armstrong v. Stone

Appeals Court of Massachusetts
Apr 24, 1981
419 N.E.2d 853 (Mass. App. Ct. 1981)

Opinion

April 24, 1981.

John P. Connor, Jr., for the plaintiff.

Robert W. Harrington ( Judith E. Diamond with him) for the defendant.


Judgment was properly entered for the defendant (a) in light of and for reasons given by the master in par. 11 of his subsidiary findings and in pars. 4b, 5, 8, 9 and 12 of his general findings and (b) for the reason given by the judge when he denied the plaintiff's motion to strike the aforementioned pars. 8, 9 and 12 and allowed the defendant's motion to adopt the master's report. Creed v. Apog, 6 Mass. App. Ct. 365, 372-373 (1978), modified on another point, 377 Mass. 522 (1979). Contrast Lipis v. Landano, 7 Mass. App. Ct. 894 (1979). The plaintiff's reliance on Tristram's Landing Inc. v. Wait, 367 Mass. 622, 629 (1975), Kinchla v. Welsh, 8 Mass. App. Ct. 367, 370-371 (1979), and Kenny v. DiCenso, 10 Mass. App. Ct. 835 (1980), is misplaced.

Judgment affirmed.


Summaries of

Armstrong v. Stone

Appeals Court of Massachusetts
Apr 24, 1981
419 N.E.2d 853 (Mass. App. Ct. 1981)
Case details for

Armstrong v. Stone

Case Details

Full title:GERALD R. ARMSTRONG vs. SIDNEY STONE

Court:Appeals Court of Massachusetts

Date published: Apr 24, 1981

Citations

419 N.E.2d 853 (Mass. App. Ct. 1981)
419 N.E.2d 853