Opinion
January, 1915.
Judgment affirmed, with costs. All concurred, except Kruse, P.J., who dissented upon the ground that the question of plaintiff's contributory negligence, as well as that of defendant's negligence, was for the jury.
From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research
Armstrong v. Minetto-Meriden Company
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Jan 1, 1915
166 App. Div. 970 (N.Y. App. Div. 1915)
Summaries of
Armstrong v. Minetto-Meriden Company
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Jan 1, 1915
166 App. Div. 970 (N.Y. App. Div. 1915)
Case details for
Armstrong v. Minetto-Meriden Company
Case Details
Full title:James D. Armstrong, Appellant, v. Minetto-Meriden Company, Respondent
Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Date published: Jan 1, 1915
Citations
166 App. Div. 970 (N.Y. App. Div. 1915)