From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Armstrong v. Jin

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Mar 6, 2020
18-cv-1380-JLS (W.D.N.Y. Mar. 6, 2020)

Opinion

18-cv-1380-JLS

03-06-2020

JASON ARMSTRONG, Plaintiff, v. DR. KEN JIN, M.D., DR. PAULA BOZER, M.D., Defendants.


DECISION AND ORDER

On November 30, 2018, Plaintiff Jason Armstrong commenced this action. Docket Item 1. On July 16, 2019, Defendants moved to dismiss Plaintiff's intentional infliction of emotional distress cause of action for failure to state a claim. Docket Item 15. Plaintiff opposed the motion on July 23, 2019. Docket Item 18. Defendants did not file any reply papers.

On August 27, 2019, this case was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Leslie G. Foschio for all proceedings under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(A) and (B). Docket Item 21. On January 30, 2020, Judge Foschio issued a Report and Recommendation ("R&R") recommending that the defendants' motion should be granted. Docket Item 24. The parties did not object to the R&R, and the time to do so now has expired. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(2).

A district court may accept, reject, or modify the findings or recommendations of a magistrate judge. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(3). A district court must conduct a de novo review of those portions of a magistrate judge's recommendation to which a party objects. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(3). But neither 28 U.S.C. § 636 nor Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72 requires a district court to review the recommendation of a magistrate judge to which no objections are raised. See Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149-50 (1985).

Although not required to do so in light of the above, this Court nevertheless has reviewed Judge Foschio's R&R as well as the parties' submissions on the motion. Based on that review and the absence of any objections, the Court accepts and adopts Judge Foschio's recommendation to grant the defendants' motion. For the reasons stated above and in the R&R, Defendants' motion to dismiss Plaintiff's claim for intentional infliction of emotional distress is GRANTED.

The case is referred back to Judge Foschio for further proceedings consistent with the referral order of August 27, 2019. SO ORDERED. Dated: March 6, 2020

Buffalo, New York

/s/_________

JOHN L. SINATRA, JR.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Armstrong v. Jin

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Mar 6, 2020
18-cv-1380-JLS (W.D.N.Y. Mar. 6, 2020)
Case details for

Armstrong v. Jin

Case Details

Full title:JASON ARMSTRONG, Plaintiff, v. DR. KEN JIN, M.D., DR. PAULA BOZER, M.D.…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Date published: Mar 6, 2020

Citations

18-cv-1380-JLS (W.D.N.Y. Mar. 6, 2020)