Armstrong v. Folino

Full title: KAREEM ARMSTRONG, Plaintiff, v. LOUIS S. FOLINO, Superintendent; CRAIG…

Court: United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: Mar 6, 2007

Civil Action No. 06 - 164 (W.D. Pa. Mar. 6, 2007)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 06 — 164.

March 6, 2007

ORDER

GARY LANCASTER, District Judge

The above captioned case was initiated on February 6, 2006 by the filing of a Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (doc. no. 1) accompanied by a Complaint. It was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Lisa Pupo Lenihan for pretrial proceedings in accordance with the Magistrate Judges Act, 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), and Rules 72.1.3 and 72.1.4 of the Local Rules for Magistrate Judges.

The Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation (doc. no. 27), filed on February 7, 2007, respectfully recommended that Defendants' Motion to Dismiss or in the Alternative Motion for Summary Judgment (doc. no. 20) be granted. Plaintiff was served at SCI Forest and was advised they he was allowed ten (10) days from the date of service to file written objections. No objections have been filed. After review of the pleadings and documents in the case, together with the Report and Recommendation, the following order is entered: AND NOW, this 6^th day of March, 2007;

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant's Motion to Dismiss or in the Alternative Motion for Summary Judgment (doc. no. 20) is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation (doc. no. 27) of Magistrate Judge Lenihan, dated February 7, 2007, is adopted as the opinion of the court.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of Court mark this Case as CLOSED.