From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Armstrong v. Armstrong

Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana
Jun 6, 2012
No. 06-12-00040-CV (Tex. App. Jun. 6, 2012)

Opinion

No. 06-12-00040-CV

06-06-2012

IN THE MATTER OF THE MARRIAGE OF RICHARD ALLEN ARMSTRONG AND WANDA RUTH ARMSTRONG


On Appeal from the 402nd Judicial District Court

Wood County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2010-388


Before Morriss, C.J., Carter and Moseley, JJ.

Memorandum Opinion by Justice Moseley

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Wanda Ruth Armstrong, appellant, filed her notice of appeal March 26, 2012.

She has neither filed a docketing statement, nor has she paid the filing fee. Armstrong is not indigent. Therefore, Armstrong is responsible for payment of the filing fee. See TEX. R. APP. P. app. A (B)(1), 20.1.

On May 10, 2012, we contacted Armstrong by letter, giving her an opportunity to cure the various defects, and warning her that if we did not receive an adequate response within ten days, this appeal would be subject to dismissal for want of prosecution. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(b), (c).

We have received no communication from Armstrong. Pursuant to TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(b), we dismiss this appeal for want of prosecution.

Bailey C. Moseley

Justice


Summaries of

Armstrong v. Armstrong

Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana
Jun 6, 2012
No. 06-12-00040-CV (Tex. App. Jun. 6, 2012)
Case details for

Armstrong v. Armstrong

Case Details

Full title:IN THE MATTER OF THE MARRIAGE OF RICHARD ALLEN ARMSTRONG AND WANDA RUTH…

Court:Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana

Date published: Jun 6, 2012

Citations

No. 06-12-00040-CV (Tex. App. Jun. 6, 2012)