Armster v. County of Riverside

Full title: MAURICE ARMSTER, Plaintiff, v. COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, et al., Defendants.

Court: United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, C.D. California

Date published: Apr 18, 2011

ED CV 10-1820-AHM(E) (C.D. Cal. Apr. 18, 2011)

Opinion

MAURICE ARMSTER, Plaintiff, v. COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, et al., Defendants. No. ED CV 10-1820-AHM(E) United States District Court, C.D. California. April 18, 2011

          ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

          A. HOWARD MATZ, District Judge

         Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. section 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition, all of the records herein and the attached Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge. The Court approves and adopts the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation.

         The Complaint is dismissed with leave to amend. If Plaintiff still wishes to pursue this action, he is granted thirty (30) days from the date of this Order within which to file a First Amended Complaint.

         Any First Amended Complaint shall be complete in itself. Plaintiff should not attempt to add additional defendants without leave of Court. See Fed.R.Civ.P. 21. Failure to file a timely First Amended Complaint may result in the dismissal of the action.