From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Armoyan v. Armoyan

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Jul 6, 2011
64 So. 3d 198 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2011)

Opinion

No. 4D11-5.

July 6, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County; Kenneth D. Stern, Judge; L.T. Case No. 502009DR012086XXXXSBFZ.

Jane Kreusler-Walsh and Stephanie L. Serafin of Kreusler-Walsh, Compani Vargas, P.A., West Palm Beach, and Melinda Penney Gamot of The Gamot Law Firm, P.L., Palm Beach, Gardens, for petitioner.

Kristen Ann Terry and Joel M. Weissman of Joel M. Weissman, P.A., West Palm Beach, for respondent.


The petition for writ of certiorari is granted and the trial court's December 15, 2010 order is quashed. The trial court departed from the essential requirements of law when it ruled that the crime-fraud exception applied to husband's claim of privilege without holding an evidentiary hearing at which husband was permitted to testify. Butler, Pappas, Weihmuller, Katz, Craig, LLP v. Coral Reef of Key Biscayne Developers, Inc., 873 So.2d 339, 342 (Fla. 3d DCA 2003). See also Walanpatrias Found, v. AMP Servs., Ltd., 964 So.2d 903, 905 (Fla. 4th DCA 2007); IDS Long Distance, Inc. v. Heiffer, 837 So.2d 1130, 1131 (Fla. 4th DCA 2003); Am. Tobacco Co. v. State, 697 So.2d 1249, 1255 (Fla. 4th DCA 1997). This matter is remanded for the trial court to allow the husband to testify and present evidence in response to the allegations of fraud.

GROSS, CIKLIN and LEVINE, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Armoyan v. Armoyan

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Jul 6, 2011
64 So. 3d 198 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2011)
Case details for

Armoyan v. Armoyan

Case Details

Full title:Vrege ARMOYAN, Petitioner, v. Lisa ARMOYAN, Respondent

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District

Date published: Jul 6, 2011

Citations

64 So. 3d 198 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2011)