From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Armijo v. Perales

United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit.
Aug 1, 2012
688 F.3d 685 (10th Cir. 2012)

Opinion

No. 11–2098.

2012-08-1

Paul ARMIJO, Plaintiff–Counter–Defendant–Appellee, v. Armando PERALES; Mirabel Jimenez; Arnold Chavez; Adrian Flores, in their individual capacities, Defendants–Appellants, D & M Sporting Goods, Defendant–Counter–Claimant, and Village of Columbus, New Mexico; Eddie Espinoza, Tracy Bolduc, Blas Gutierrez, Roberto Gutierrez, Brian Houltin, Allen Rosenberg, in their individual capacities; Sixth Judicial District Attorney's Office; Ernie Sera; Border Operations Task Force, Defendants.


Editor's Note: The opinion of the United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit, in Armijo v. Perales, published in the advance sheet at this citation, 688 F.3d 685, was withdrawn from the bound volume per order of the court dated September 6, 2012.


Summaries of

Armijo v. Perales

United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit.
Aug 1, 2012
688 F.3d 685 (10th Cir. 2012)
Case details for

Armijo v. Perales

Case Details

Full title:Paul ARMIJO, Plaintiff–Counter–Defendant–Appellee, v. Armando PERALES…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit.

Date published: Aug 1, 2012

Citations

688 F.3d 685 (10th Cir. 2012)
34 Int'l Env't Rep. (BNA) 101

Citing Cases

Paden v. Keeling

And Keeling contends that under his version of the facts—namely, that Paden was terminated based solely on…