Armentero v. Schartz

Full title: LUIS LORENZO ARMENTERO, Plaintiff, v. SCHARTZ, et al., Defendants.

Court: United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California

Date published: Feb 23, 2015

2:15-cv-0360 KJN P (E.D. Cal. Feb. 23, 2015)

Opinion

LUIS LORENZO ARMENTERO, Plaintiff, v. SCHARTZ, et al., Defendants. No. 2:15-cv-0360 KJN P United States District Court, E.D. California. February 23, 2015

          ORDER

          KENDALL J. NEWMAN, Magistrate Judge.

         Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. In his complaint, plaintiff alleges violations of his civil rights by defendants. The alleged violations took place in Kings County, which is part of the Fresno Division of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California. See Local Rule 120(d).

         Pursuant to Local Rule 120(f), a civil action which has not been commenced in the proper division of a court may, on the court's own motion, be transferred to the proper division of the court. Therefore, this action will be transferred to the Fresno Division of the court.

         Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. This action is transferred to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California sitting in Fresno; and

2. All future filings shall reference the new Fresno case number assigned and shall be filed at: