From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Armendariz v. Lappin

United States District Court, W.D. Oklahoma
Sep 21, 2010
Case No. CIV-10-850-M (W.D. Okla. Sep. 21, 2010)

Summary

denying pauper status under §1915 (g) because plaintiff presented only vague allegations of a denial of special needs for his diabetic condition

Summary of this case from Ford v. Gusman

Opinion

Case No. CIV-10-850-M.

September 21, 2010


ORDER


On September 9, 2010, United States Magistrate Judge Gary M. Purcell issued a Report and Recommendation in this action brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The Magistrate Judge recommended that this action be dismissed without prejudice due to plaintiff's failure to comply with the orders of the Court and failure to pay the required filing fee. Plaintiff was advised of his right to object to the Report and Recommendation by September 29, 2010, and on September 16, 2010, plaintiff filed his objection.

Having carefully reviewed this matter de novo, the Court:

(1) ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation issued by the Magistrate Judge on September 9, 2010, and
(2) DISMISSES this action without prejudice due to plaintiff's failure to comply with the orders of the Court and failure to pay the required filing fee.

IT IS SO ORDERED this 21st day of September, 2010.


Summaries of

Armendariz v. Lappin

United States District Court, W.D. Oklahoma
Sep 21, 2010
Case No. CIV-10-850-M (W.D. Okla. Sep. 21, 2010)

denying pauper status under §1915 (g) because plaintiff presented only vague allegations of a denial of special needs for his diabetic condition

Summary of this case from Ford v. Gusman
Case details for

Armendariz v. Lappin

Case Details

Full title:HERBEY ARMENDARIZ, Plaintiff, v. HARLEY G. LAPPIN, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, W.D. Oklahoma

Date published: Sep 21, 2010

Citations

Case No. CIV-10-850-M (W.D. Okla. Sep. 21, 2010)

Citing Cases

Ford v. Gusman

He has not alleged that his condition at present has deteriorated as a result, or that serious physical…