From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Armendariz-Rascon v. Warden

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Apr 27, 2023
2:23-cv-00576-JDP (HC) (E.D. Cal. Apr. 27, 2023)

Opinion

2:23-cv-00576-JDP (HC)

04-27-2023

MIGUEL ARMENDARIZ-RASCON, Petitioner, v. WARDEN, Respondent.


ORDER

JEREMY D. PETERSON UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Petitioner, a federal prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed an application for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. Petitioner has not, however, filed an in forma pauperis affidavit or paid the required filing fee ($5.00). See 28 U.S.C. §§ 1914(a); 1915(a). Petitioner will be provided the opportunity to submit either the appropriate affidavit in support of a request to proceed in forma pauperis or the appropriate filing fee.

In accordance with the above, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Petitioner shall submit, within thirty days from the date of this order, an affidavit in support of his request to proceed in forma pauperis or the appropriate filing fee; petitioner's failure to comply with this order will result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed; and

2. The Clerk of Court is directed to send petitioner a copy of the in forma pauperis form used by this district.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Armendariz-Rascon v. Warden

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Apr 27, 2023
2:23-cv-00576-JDP (HC) (E.D. Cal. Apr. 27, 2023)
Case details for

Armendariz-Rascon v. Warden

Case Details

Full title:MIGUEL ARMENDARIZ-RASCON, Petitioner, v. WARDEN, Respondent.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Apr 27, 2023

Citations

2:23-cv-00576-JDP (HC) (E.D. Cal. Apr. 27, 2023)