From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Armao v. Retirement Life, Inc.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Oct 11, 1966
190 So. 2d 814 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1966)

Opinion

No. I-123.

October 11, 1966.

Interlocutory Appeal from the Circuit Court for Volusia County; Robert H. Wingfield, Judge.

Anthony I. Provitola, of Clary Mattingly, Deland, for appellants.

Eli H. Subin, of Roth, Segal Levine, Orlando, W.J. Gardiner, Daytona Beach, and John E. Socash, Deland, for appellees.


This is an interlocutory appeal from an order of the Circuit Court in and for Volusia County denying a motion for summary judgment.

We have reviewed the record and briefs and are of the opinion that there are sufficient inferences to create an issue of fact which should not be determined by the court in a summary judgment. For the reasons stated, this appeal is dismissed. It should be clearly understood, however, that by dismissal of this appeal, this court has in no way passed upon the merits of the case in any other particular.

Interlocutory appeal dismissed.

WIGGINTON, Acting C.J., and JOHNSON and SACK, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Armao v. Retirement Life, Inc.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Oct 11, 1966
190 So. 2d 814 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1966)
Case details for

Armao v. Retirement Life, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:THOMAS H. ARMAO, JOANNE PECK ARMAO, HIS WIFE, JOHN B. MATTINGLY, ESQUIRE…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District

Date published: Oct 11, 1966

Citations

190 So. 2d 814 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1966)