From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Pimentel y Cao v. Brownell

United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit
Nov 27, 1953
208 F.2d 47 (D.C. Cir. 1953)

Opinion

No. 11623.

Argued November 10, 1953.

Decided November 27, 1953.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia.

Mr. Josephus C. Trimble, Washington, D.C., with whom Mr. Max L. Rosenstein, Newark, N.J., was on the brief, for appellant.

Mr. Lewis A. Carroll, Asst. U.S. Atty., Washington, D.C., with whom Messrs. Leo A. Rover, U.S. Atty., and William J. Peck, Asst. U.S. Atty., Washington, D.C., at time brief was filed, were on the brief, for appellees. Messrs. Charles M. Irelan, U.S. Atty., at time record was filed, Joseph M. Howard and William R. Glendon, Asst. U.S. Attys., Washington, D.C., at time record was filed, also entered appearances for appellees.

Before EDGERTON, CLARK, and WILBUR K. MILLER, Circuit Judges.


The judgment of the District Court is affirmed. Heikkila v. Barber, 345 U.S. 229, 73 S.Ct. 603.


Summaries of

Pimentel y Cao v. Brownell

United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit
Nov 27, 1953
208 F.2d 47 (D.C. Cir. 1953)
Case details for

Pimentel y Cao v. Brownell

Case Details

Full title:ARMANDO PIMENTEL Y CAO, appellant v. Herbert BROWNELL, Jr., Attorney…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit

Date published: Nov 27, 1953

Citations

208 F.2d 47 (D.C. Cir. 1953)

Citing Cases

Kochanny v. Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco

The thrust of petitioner's argument is that by the enactment of the Civil Service Reform Act of 1978, Chapter…

Hatcher v. Department of the Air Force

Petitioner's Brief at 17-18. This is a barely disguised attempt to read into Chapter 75 the specific…