From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Armand Schmoll, Inc. v. Commonwealth Dominion Line

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jun 2, 1932
182 N.E. 203 (N.Y. 1932)

Opinion

Argued May 11, 1932

Decided June 2, 1932

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

L. deGrove Potter, John J. Heckman and Joseph W. Whelan for appellant.

Neil P. Cullom and James E. Freehill for respondent.


Judgment affirmed, with costs. Held, that while it was error to place the burden of proving seaworthiness upon the defendant, yet this ruling was harmless in view of all the evidence. No opinion.

Concur: POUND, Ch. J., CRANE, LEHMAN, KELLOGG, O'BRIEN, HUBBS and CROUCH, JJ.


Summaries of

Armand Schmoll, Inc. v. Commonwealth Dominion Line

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jun 2, 1932
182 N.E. 203 (N.Y. 1932)
Case details for

Armand Schmoll, Inc. v. Commonwealth Dominion Line

Case Details

Full title:ARMAND SCHMOLL, INC., Respondent, v. COMMONWEALTH DOMINION LINE, LTD.…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Jun 2, 1932

Citations

182 N.E. 203 (N.Y. 1932)
182 N.E. 203

Citing Cases

General Cigar Co., Inc., v. Reading Co.

The duty of a carrier to use reasonable care to protect the shipper's property from damage, after the…